|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Outz Xacto
Echelon Munitions
20
   |
Posted - 2012.02.29 18:56:00 -
[1] - Quote
How about we just make cloak also remove you from local, that way cloaking will really screw with you like it should. |
Outz Xacto
Echelon Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 19:52:00 -
[2] - Quote
Torothin wrote:AFK cloaking to disrupt activity is mega gaming. Too many people make assumptions. This isn't a thread to complain. But again if you are going to disrupt industry then you should disrupt industry while being present at your computer. This is right up there with botting.
This is nothing close to botting, and its stupid that several people have compared this to botting.
Botting is about by some means, typically a 3rd party program to simulate how you would actively play a game, with the general consensus that this is done for personal gain.
No third party program is used to sit afk cloaked, there is no simulation of active play, there is no actual personal gain/progression that takes place that is unique to doing this.
If the person is afk the only affect they have is psychological, how you allow that to affect you is your choice. |
Outz Xacto
Echelon Munitions
20
|
Posted - 2012.02.29 19:55:00 -
[3] - Quote
-1 internets for my bad double posting |
Outz Xacto
Echelon Munitions
24
|
Posted - 2012.03.01 18:09:00 -
[4] - Quote
Torothin wrote:Dealing with it is not the issue. As stated above. Like many of you have said. It is an effective and legit way to disrupt the industry of an entity. But in order to do industry in 0.0 one must be active. Therefore if one is to disrupt industry in 0.0, one should also be active. That is my argument. It is mega gaming. Don't sit there and tell me this is not a valid argument..
You missed it. People are saying due to local providing you free intel, they have to afk in system in order strike when it is unexpected, the only way for them to throw you off, since you've been given free intel, is to make that free intel you recieved unreliable.
What you want, and are asking for is to make it less risky to run your industrial activity. If these people didn't show up in local when cloaked, what purpose would there be to sit afk cloaked? It would have no psychological affect on you, and wouldn't disrupt your gaming, the only disruption at that point would be when they attack. Which you wont go for that kind of change because you're too soft, if you can't deal with low sec/null then don't go. |
Outz Xacto
Echelon Munitions
35
|
Posted - 2012.03.23 20:33:00 -
[5] - Quote
Torothin wrote:
Exactly. Have a cloaked afk neutral in every single system is a bit ridiculous. There needs to be a way to decloak these guys. i feel that a manual activation cycle would be best.
Life must be nice in your bubble of concern. Cause an arbitrary duration wouldn't have any kinds of adverse affects in other areas now would it. And clearly, these people would never find a way around sitting afk for hours even with a manual activation now would they.
Come up with something useful that doesn't just involve your feeble situation and actually looks at other parts of the game before you run off making another idiotic suggestion. |
|
|
| |
|